California 1937 Act retirement reporting software

37 Act reporting made clear, defensible, and board-ready.

37Act turns payroll, member, employer, actuarial, financial, and audit inputs into one governed reporting workspace for California county retirement systems governed by CERL.

Focus

CERL scope

Focus

Evidence lineage

Focus

Board-ready output

CERL

Built for 1937 Act systems

A narrow reporting workspace for California county retirement systems — not generic BI retrofitted for public pensions.

GASB

GASB 67/68 support

Organize plan schedules, employer disclosure support, source references, and reviewer signoff in one reporting cycle.

AUDIT

Audit-supporting evidence

Preserve imports, exceptions, assumptions, approvals, exports, and review notes by fiscal year.

BOARD

Board-ready packets

Create executive summaries, exhibits, status views, and appendix materials without rebuilding everything from scratch.

Abstract civic-fintech ledger interface showing evidence paths, validation signals, and board packet materials

Reporting cockpit

Source filesExceptionsPacket status
Source intakeException trailBoard-ready

Direct answer

What 37Act is

37Act is a reporting operations workspace for California 1937 Act / CERL retirement systems. It does not replace the pension administration platform, ERP, actuary, auditor, or finance team. It gives those teams a shared place to manage the annual reporting cycle: source file intake, validation, exception resolution, actuarial data packages, GASB support schedules, audit evidence, and board packet production.

The product is designed for the reporting work that happens between systems and people: employer payroll and contribution files, member data, financial schedules, actuarial requests, audit workpapers, review comments, approvals, exports, and public-facing board materials.

Market signal

A small, specialized market deserves purpose-built software.

The 1937 Act universe is focused enough for a deeply opinionated product and complex enough that spreadsheets, email, and shared drives leave too much reporting risk behind.

20

California counties operate under CERL

SACRS describes twenty California counties operating retirement systems under the 1937 Act.

3 yrs

Maximum actuarial valuation interval

Government Code section 31453 requires valuations at intervals not to exceed three years.

Dec 31

Annual financial statement filing marker

Government Code section 31597.1 sets a December 31 filing timing where adopted by county resolution.

A site style built for one market

Not another generic SaaS dashboard — a civic ledger system.

37Act now leans into a more ownable visual language: county-office paper trails, actuarial workpapers, board-packet ribbons, source lineage, and validation signals. The design should feel precise enough for auditors and warm enough for public-sector teams who live in documents all year.

01Source filesPayroll · member · employer
02ValidationTotals · status · dates
03EvidenceNotes · approvals · exports
04Board packetSummaries · exhibits · appendix
The reporting problem

The annual reporting fire drill is a workflow problem, not just a spreadsheet problem.

Retirement teams already have source systems, auditors, actuaries, finance tools, and board processes. The gap is the governed workspace connecting them.

Current state

Typical manual cycle

  • !Payroll, contribution, member, actuarial, and accounting files live in different systems and folders.
  • !Review status is tracked in email, meeting notes, one-off spreadsheets, or individual memory.
  • !Exceptions are discovered late, after schedules and packets are already being assembled.
  • !Audit evidence is recreated every year instead of carried through the reporting workflow.
  • !Board packet exhibits and narratives are manually rebuilt for each fiscal year.

With 37Act

37Act reporting workspace

  • Fiscal-year reporting model ties source imports, assumptions, exceptions, and exports together.
  • Validation rules surface missing files, contribution mismatches, member anomalies, and unresolved review items early.
  • Actuarial, GASB, audit, employer, finance, and board outputs share the same evidence trail.
  • Role-based review notes, approvals, and packet status give leadership a clear reporting cockpit.
  • Reusable cycles preserve institutional knowledge across staff changes and reporting years.
Platform modules

The product layer between source systems and final reporting outputs.

Every module is framed around a real 1937 Act reporting job-to-be-done: gather the data, validate it, explain exceptions, prepare outputs, and preserve evidence.

01
01

Contribution & payroll intake

Normalize employer payroll, member, contribution, pay-period, service-credit, and adjustment feeds into a fiscal-year reporting model.

02
02

Exception management

Flag missing files, contribution mismatches, status changes, unresolved review notes, and stale assumptions before they become audit or board questions.

03
03

Actuarial data packages

Prepare repeatable valuation extracts and supporting schedules with versioning, assumptions, reconciliation notes, and source-file context preserved.

04
04

GASB schedule workspace

Support GASB 67 plan reporting and GASB 68 employer disclosure packages with source references, draft/review states, and export history.

05
05

Audit trail & evidence binder

Keep imports, overrides, comments, approvals, workpapers, and final exports tied to a fiscal year and reporting cycle.

06
06

Board packet builder

Generate management summaries, exhibits, status dashboards, exception logs, and appendices for retirement board and committee review.

Workflow

A clean path from source data to public-facing confidence.

Use the site and demo narrative to show a repeatable reporting cadence, not a black-box compliance promise.

01

Step 1

Create the fiscal-year workspace

Set up the reporting year, source list, owners, due dates, expected employer files, actuarial requests, audit requests, and board milestones.

02

Step 2

Import and validate source data

Bring in payroll, member, contribution, actuarial, investment, and accounting files; run checks for completeness, totals, status changes, and roll-forward consistency.

03

Step 3

Resolve exceptions with evidence

Assign issues, capture reviewer notes, document assumptions, attach workpapers, and preserve why adjustments were made.

04

Step 4

Export reports and board packets

Produce actuarial data packages, GASB support schedules, audit binders, management summaries, exhibits, and board-ready packets from the same traceable model.

Abstract evidence chain connecting source files, actuarial packages, GASB schedules, audit binder, and board packet outputs

Workflow visual

From source files to evidence-backed board materials

01

Source intake

Payroll, member, employer, finance, actuarial and audit files arrive with owners and due dates.

02

Validation

Completeness, totals, status changes, contribution mismatches and stale assumptions are surfaced early.

03

Exception queue

Reviewers assign, comment, attach evidence and resolve open reporting questions.

04

Output packages

Actuarial extracts, GASB support, audit binders and board packets share the same traceable record.

Reporting chainConcept workflow: source data intake, validation, exception resolution, GASB and actuarial support, audit evidence, and board packet output.
Site map

A full website around the administrator’s reporting journey.

The site now supports more than a single landing page: it gives buyers paths into the problem, integration model, implementation plan, governance story, and SEO pillar topics.

01
PAIN

Pain points

Speak directly to administrators dealing with source file uncertainty, late exceptions, audit pressure, and board packet deadlines. Read the pain-point guide.

02
INT

Integrations

Explain how 37Act plugs into existing pension, payroll, finance, actuarial, audit, and document workflows without a rip-and-replace project.

03
PILOT

Implementation

Frame the offer as a focused workflow assessment and design-partner pilot that becomes a repeatable annual reporting platform.

04
GOV

Security & governance

Build trust with role-based access, source lineage, evidence management, approval history, and controlled exports.

05
TOOLS

Reporting tools

Give teams practical source-file inventories, validation maps, exception logs, evidence checklists, and board packet readiness reviews.

06
RESEARCH

Research briefing

Keep public sources, Government Code references, report examples, and buyer questions flowing into guide updates and product assumptions.

07
SEO

Reporting guides

Own long-tail searches around 37 Act reporting software, CERL requirements, GASB support, actuarial data, and board packets.

08
DEMO

Workflow assessment

Give serious buyers a clear next step: map their actual reporting cycle, files, owners, exceptions, and outputs.

Buyer questions

What retirement system leaders will want answered.

The site should answer the practical questions a CFO, administrator, reporting manager, or board-support team will ask before a design-partner conversation.

Who is 37Act for?

37Act is for California county retirement systems governed by the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, especially finance, reporting, operations, actuarial, audit, and board-support teams.

What does it replace?

It replaces disconnected spreadsheet assembly and scattered evidence tracking. It does not replace the core pension administration system, finance system, auditor, actuary, or legal review.

What makes this different from BI?

BI tools visualize data. 37Act is positioned around the reporting cycle itself: source intake, validation, exceptions, evidence, schedule preparation, review, approvals, and packet output.

How does it help with GASB 67 and GASB 68?

The workspace organizes source schedules, supporting calculations, employer disclosure package inputs, reviewer signoff, and export history so GASB support is traceable and repeatable.

Can it support a high-touch design partner pilot?

Yes. The current offer is best framed as a workflow assessment and pilot workspace built around one system’s actual reporting cycle, source files, and board/audit deliverables.

Help shape the easiest reporting workspace for California 1937 Act systems.

We are looking for a small group of retirement-system finance, operations, actuarial, audit, and executive teams to pressure-test the reporting model with real workflows.

Book a working session